The Verdict on VP Pence’s Stand in the Gohmert Case: A Sentimental Analysis

Introduction

The recent legal developments in the aftermath of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election have sparked a myriad of debates, particularly regarding the role and responsibilities of Vice President Mike Pence in disputes over electoral votes. In a recent case, Rep. Louie Gohmert requested that Vice President Pence discontinue the legal process, indicating a certain level of intrigue in political maneuvering. In this article, we will explore the legal reasoning behind the Vice President’s actions, the importance of logical thinking in governance, and the continuing relevance of the Electoral College in the American political system.

VP Pence’s Role and Responsibilities

Mike Pence, as Vice President of the United States, must adhere to a clear directive in his constitutional duties. His primary obligation in the context of the Electoral College is to read aloud the official counts as submitted by the electors. If the electors wish to submit alternative counts, they must formally request it from Congress, thereby initiating a legislative process (source: U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 4).

Logical Thinking in Governance

Logical and rational decision-making is a fundamental requirement for elected officials, especially those in leadership positions such as the Vice President. Rep. Louie Gohmert’s actions highlight a significant lack of logical reasoning in his argument. His request for the case to be thrown out of court is based on a misunderstanding of the legal and procedural framework outlined in the U.S. Constitution.

Legal Analysis and Court Decisions

The legal challenge filed by Texas against several states, including Pennsylvania, over the electoral college votes was dismissed for lack of standing. Texas, as a state, does not have the authority to sue other states over their election procedures as these are considered internal matters (source: U.S. Supreme Court, Camreta v. Greene, 563 U.S. 692 (2011)).

State election officials submitted their official ballots, which were stamped with their respective state seals, ensuring that any alternative ballots (e.g., from “alternative electors”) had no legal standing. The official count of electoral votes, read by Vice President Pence, is a purely ceremonial act that does not alter the outcome of the election (source: U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 4).

Aftermath and Reflection

The decision to dismiss the lawsuit was not without precedent, as federal judges consistently dismiss frivolous and unproven claims, particularly when it comes to political disputes. Judge Kernodle’s ruling, as well as the Gohmert’s dismissal opinion (Gohmert dismissal.opinion.pdf), clearly illustrates the judicial system’s role in upholding the constitutional order and ensuring that political rhetoric does not undermine the legal process.

Conclusion

The ongoing debate over the Electoral College and its relevance in contemporary American politics remains a contentious issue. While some might argue for its removal, the current system continues to play a crucial role in the democratic process. The actions of elected officials like Rep. Gohmert and Vice President Pence underscore the importance of adhering to logical and constitutional frameworks. As the nation heads towards another election in 2022, it is critical that all participants respect the legal and procedural frameworks that have been established to ensure fair and transparent democratic processes.

Implications and Future Outlook

The dismissal of this lawsuit and the ongoing discussions surrounding the Electoral College highlight several key issues:

Respect for legal and constitutional frameworks The role of logic and rationality in governance Public accountability and its importance in democratic processes

As the political landscape continues to evolve, it is essential that all participants maintain a commitment to these principles to ensure the integrity and strength of the American democracy.